Time Spent

Add a reply

Posted by caelestis 787 days ago:
Am I the only sad muppet trying to puzzle out how on earth I can get my code down to 176 bytes?
Posted by rretzbach 787 days ago:
nope I am at 234 and know a 206 char version, but I have absolutely no Idea how to shrink it another 30 chars :>
I bet there are many golf tricks I don't know. I would like to hack this site and get all code. :(
Posted by pfft 769 days ago:
I don't see any reason why the site would need to store the code.
Posted by caseinoint 13 days ago:
Maybe it could be up to the poster if the site would post the code if it is the winning post.
Posted by SplinterFL 11 days ago:
There is also the issue of readability. Small code is nice, but clean code is better. I can get down to 300 bytes without using compression schemes or code packing in to an eval (perl). I think the 176 was using a string compression of the code.
Posted by eyepopslikeamosquito 5 days ago:
SplinterFL:
I think the 176 was using a string compression of the code
To set the record straight, this is wild speculation by someone with zero golf experience; at least I don't see SplinterFL mentioned on any game board. Notice that the 176 has subsequently been whittled to 165. Though I can't comment on 0xF's 165 and I'm sorry to disappoint SplinterFL, I'm happy to reveal that my 168 uses just a humble sub and a lowly print statement inside a simple for loop ... and does not use any "compression schemes or code packing in to an eval" :-).

Add a reply